Chile vs Oman: Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$
Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ over time
- Chile
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 2,570 millions against 2,412 millions in Chile, a difference of 158 millions.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 32nd and Oman ranks 31st of 92 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 879.46 millions | 796.23 millions | 83.23 millions | Chile |
| 2000s | 1,421 millions | 705.81 millions | 715.4 millions | Chile |
| 2010s | 1,950 millions | 1,134 millions | 815.4 millions | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$, Chile or Oman?
- Oman, at 2,570 millions against 2,412 millions in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$ between Chile and Oman?
- 158 millions, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Oman?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Oman rank globally for government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$?
- Chile ranks 32nd and Oman ranks 31st of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ (millions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total general (local, regional and central) government expenditure on lower secondary education (current, capital, and transfers), in millions PPP$ (at purchasing power parity) in constant value (taking into account inflation). It includes expenditure funded by transfers from international sources to government. Total government expenditure for a given level of education (e.g. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) in national currency is converted to PPP$, and where it is expressed in constant value, uses a GDP deflator to account for inflation. The constant prices base year is normally three years before the year of the data release. For example, in the July 2017 data release, constant PPP$ values are expressed in 2014 prices. Limitations: In some instances data on total government expenditure on education refers only to the Ministry of Education, excluding other ministries which may also spend a part of their budget on educational activities. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/