Cambodia vs Latvia: Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$
Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ over time
- Cambodia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 349.69 millions against 282.49 millions in Cambodia, a difference of 67.2 millions.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Cambodia's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 63rd and Latvia ranks 61st of 92 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.12 millions | 474.1 millions | 377.98 millions | Latvia |
| 2010s | 221.93 millions | 395.13 millions | 173.2 millions | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$, Cambodia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 349.69 millions against 282.49 millions in Cambodia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$ between Cambodia and Latvia?
- 67.2 millions, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Latvia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.
- How do Cambodia and Latvia rank globally for government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$?
- Cambodia ranks 63rd and Latvia ranks 61st of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ (millions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total general (local, regional and central) government expenditure on lower secondary education (current, capital, and transfers), in millions PPP$ (at purchasing power parity) in constant value (taking into account inflation). It includes expenditure funded by transfers from international sources to government. Total government expenditure for a given level of education (e.g. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) in national currency is converted to PPP$, and where it is expressed in constant value, uses a GDP deflator to account for inflation. The constant prices base year is normally three years before the year of the data release. For example, in the July 2017 data release, constant PPP$ values are expressed in 2014 prices. Limitations: In some instances data on total government expenditure on education refers only to the Ministry of Education, excluding other ministries which may also spend a part of their budget on educational activities. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/