Burkina Faso vs Malawi: Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$
Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ over time
- Burkina Faso
- Malawi
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 212.67 millions against 175.75 millions in Malawi, a difference of 36.92 millions.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 69th and Malawi ranks 71st of 92 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$, Burkina Faso or Malawi?
- Burkina Faso, at 212.67 millions against 175.75 millions in Malawi as of 2016.
- What is the difference in government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$ between Burkina Faso and Malawi?
- 36.92 millions, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Malawi?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2016.
- How do Burkina Faso and Malawi rank globally for government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$?
- Burkina Faso ranks 69th and Malawi ranks 71st of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ (millions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total general (local, regional and central) government expenditure on lower secondary education (current, capital, and transfers), in millions PPP$ (at purchasing power parity) in constant value (taking into account inflation). It includes expenditure funded by transfers from international sources to government. Total government expenditure for a given level of education (e.g. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) in national currency is converted to PPP$, and where it is expressed in constant value, uses a GDP deflator to account for inflation. The constant prices base year is normally three years before the year of the data release. For example, in the July 2017 data release, constant PPP$ values are expressed in 2014 prices. Limitations: In some instances data on total government expenditure on education refers only to the Ministry of Education, excluding other ministries which may also spend a part of their budget on educational activities. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/