Austria vs Viet Nam: Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$
Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ over time
- Austria
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 7,055 millions against 5,633 millions in Austria, a difference of 1,422 millions.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.3 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 20th and Viet Nam ranks 18th of 92 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,546 millions | 4,912 millions | 634.36 millions | Austria |
| 2010s | 5,519 millions | 6,170 millions | 651.49 millions | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$, Austria or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 7,055 millions against 5,633 millions in Austria as of 2013.
- What is the difference in government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$ between Austria and Viet Nam?
- 1,422 millions, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Viet Nam?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2013.
- How do Austria and Viet Nam rank globally for government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$?
- Austria ranks 20th and Viet Nam ranks 18th of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ (millions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total general (local, regional and central) government expenditure on lower secondary education (current, capital, and transfers), in millions PPP$ (at purchasing power parity) in constant value (taking into account inflation). It includes expenditure funded by transfers from international sources to government. Total government expenditure for a given level of education (e.g. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) in national currency is converted to PPP$, and where it is expressed in constant value, uses a GDP deflator to account for inflation. The constant prices base year is normally three years before the year of the data release. For example, in the July 2017 data release, constant PPP$ values are expressed in 2014 prices. Limitations: In some instances data on total government expenditure on education refers only to the Ministry of Education, excluding other ministries which may also spend a part of their budget on educational activities. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/