Malawi vs Tunisia: Government Effectiveness
Malawi
0.1854 standard error
in 2011
Tunisia
0.1791 standard error
in 2011
Malawi rank
31st
Tunisia rank
34th
Government Effectiveness over time
- Malawi
- Tunisia
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.1854 standard error against 0.1791 standard error in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0063 standard error.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Tunisia ahead.
Malawi ranks 31st and Tunisia ranks 34th of 53 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2249 standard error | 0.2249 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
| 2000s | 0.1823 standard error | 0.178 standard error | 0.0043 standard error | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.186 standard error | 0.1802 standard error | 0.0058 standard error | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness, Malawi or Tunisia?
- Malawi, at 0.1854 standard error against 0.1791 standard error in Tunisia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness between Malawi and Tunisia?
- 0.0063 standard error, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tunisia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Malawi and Tunisia rank globally for government effectiveness?
- Malawi ranks 31st and Tunisia ranks 34th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Government Effectiveness (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.GOVT.EF.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.