Equatorial Guinea vs Guinea-Bissau: Government Effectiveness
Government Effectiveness over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.2318 standard error against 0.2285 standard error in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0033 standard error.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 3rd of 53 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2419 standard error | 0.2629 standard error | 0.021 standard error | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 0.2268 standard error | 0.2383 standard error | 0.0114 standard error | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 0.229 standard error | 0.2323 standard error | 0.0033 standard error | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness, Equatorial Guinea or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 0.2318 standard error against 0.2285 standard error in Equatorial Guinea as of 2011.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness between Equatorial Guinea and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.0033 standard error, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Guinea-Bissau?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for government effectiveness?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 3rd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Government Effectiveness (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.GOVT.EF.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.