Egypt vs Namibia: Government Effectiveness
Egypt
0.1791 standard error
in 2011
Namibia
0.1832 standard error
in 2011
Egypt rank
34th
Namibia rank
33rd
Government Effectiveness over time
- Egypt
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.1832 standard error against 0.1791 standard error in Egypt, a difference of 0.0041 standard error.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Namibia ahead.
Egypt ranks 34th and Namibia ranks 33rd of 53 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2178 standard error | 0.2249 standard error | 0.0072 standard error | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0.1764 standard error | 0.1802 standard error | 0.0038 standard error | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.1802 standard error | 0.1844 standard error | 0.0043 standard error | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness, Egypt or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0.1832 standard error against 0.1791 standard error in Egypt as of 2011.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness between Egypt and Namibia?
- 0.0041 standard error, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Namibia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Egypt and Namibia rank globally for government effectiveness?
- Egypt ranks 34th and Namibia ranks 33rd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Government Effectiveness (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.GOVT.EF.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.