Egypt vs Malawi: Government Effectiveness
Egypt
0.1791 standard error
in 2011
Malawi
0.1854 standard error
in 2011
Egypt rank
34th
Malawi rank
31st
Government Effectiveness over time
- Egypt
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.1854 standard error against 0.1791 standard error in Egypt, a difference of 0.0063 standard error.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Malawi ahead.
Egypt ranks 34th and Malawi ranks 31st of 53 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2178 standard error | 0.2249 standard error | 0.0072 standard error | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0.1764 standard error | 0.1823 standard error | 0.0059 standard error | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.1802 standard error | 0.186 standard error | 0.0058 standard error | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness, Egypt or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 0.1854 standard error against 0.1791 standard error in Egypt as of 2011.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness between Egypt and Malawi?
- 0.0063 standard error, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Malawi?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Egypt and Malawi rank globally for government effectiveness?
- Egypt ranks 34th and Malawi ranks 31st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Government Effectiveness (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.GOVT.EF.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.