Djibouti vs Eswatini: Government Effectiveness
Government Effectiveness over time
- Djibouti
- Eswatini
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 0.226 standard error against 0.2104 standard error in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0156 standard error.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eswatini ahead.
Djibouti ranks 6th and Eswatini ranks 9th of 53 countries.
Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2914 standard error | 0.2914 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
| 2000s | 0.2624 standard error | 0.2507 standard error | 0.0118 standard error | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 0.2264 standard error | 0.2115 standard error | 0.015 standard error | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness, Djibouti or Eswatini?
- Djibouti, at 0.226 standard error against 0.2104 standard error in Eswatini as of 2011.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness between Djibouti and Eswatini?
- 0.0156 standard error, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Eswatini?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Djibouti and Eswatini rank globally for government effectiveness?
- Djibouti ranks 6th and Eswatini ranks 9th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Government Effectiveness (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.GOVT.EF.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.