Democratic Republic of Congo vs Congo: Government Effectiveness
Government Effectiveness over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Congo
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 0.1899 standard error against 0.1899 standard error in Congo, a difference of 0 standard error.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Congo ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 24th and Congo ranks 24th of 53 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2629 standard error | 0.2629 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
| 2000s | 0.2157 standard error | 0.2176 standard error | 0.0019 standard error | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.1906 standard error | 0.1906 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness, Democratic Republic of Congo or Congo?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 0.1899 standard error against 0.1899 standard error in Congo as of 2011.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness between Democratic Republic of Congo and Congo?
- 0 standard error, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Congo?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Congo rank globally for government effectiveness?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 24th and Congo ranks 24th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Government Effectiveness (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.GOVT.EF.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.