Central African Republic vs Eswatini: Government Effectiveness
Government Effectiveness over time
- Central African Republic
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.2104 standard error against 0.2039 standard error in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0065 standard error.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eswatini ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 12th and Eswatini ranks 9th of 53 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2914 standard error | 0.2914 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
| 2000s | 0.248 standard error | 0.2507 standard error | 0.0027 standard error | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.2045 standard error | 0.2115 standard error | 0.0069 standard error | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness, Central African Republic or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 0.2104 standard error against 0.2039 standard error in Central African Republic as of 2011.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness between Central African Republic and Eswatini?
- 0.0065 standard error, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Eswatini?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Central African Republic and Eswatini rank globally for government effectiveness?
- Central African Republic ranks 12th and Eswatini ranks 9th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Government Effectiveness (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.GOVT.EF.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.