St. Kitts and Nevis vs Uruguay: Government Effectiveness - Governance score
Government Effectiveness - Governance score over time
- St. Kitts and Nevis
- Uruguay
How they compare
St. Kitts and Nevis currently reports 64.78 0-100 against 64.77 0-100 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.01 0-100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Uruguay ahead.
St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 52nd and Uruguay ranks 53rd of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, St. Kitts and Nevis averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | St. Kitts and Nevis | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.94 0-100 | 61.78 0-100 | 6.16 0-100 | St. Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 69.49 0-100 | 62.71 0-100 | 6.78 0-100 | St. Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 64.03 0-100 | 67.05 0-100 | 3.02 0-100 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance score, St. Kitts and Nevis or Uruguay?
- St. Kitts and Nevis, at 64.78 0-100 against 64.77 0-100 in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance score between St. Kitts and Nevis and Uruguay?
- 0.01 0-100, with St. Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for St. Kitts and Nevis and Uruguay?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do St. Kitts and Nevis and Uruguay rank globally for government effectiveness - governance score?
- St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 52nd and Uruguay ranks 53rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).