Panama vs Senegal: Government Effectiveness - Governance score
Government Effectiveness - Governance score over time
- Panama
- Senegal
How they compare
Panama currently reports 56.11 0-100 against 55.9 0-100 in Senegal, a difference of 0.21 0-100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Senegal ahead.
Panama ranks 82nd and Senegal ranks 83rd of 204 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49.51 0-100 | 42.78 0-100 | 6.73 0-100 | Panama |
| 2000s | 50.04 0-100 | 41.38 0-100 | 8.66 0-100 | Panama |
| 2010s | 56.79 0-100 | 48.58 0-100 | 8.21 0-100 | Panama |
| 2020s | 54.29 0-100 | 54.15 0-100 | 0.1374 0-100 | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance score, Panama or Senegal?
- Panama, at 56.11 0-100 against 55.9 0-100 in Senegal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance score between Panama and Senegal?
- 0.21 0-100, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Senegal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Panama and Senegal rank globally for government effectiveness - governance score?
- Panama ranks 82nd and Senegal ranks 83rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).