Nauru vs Tonga: Government Effectiveness - Governance score
Government Effectiveness - Governance score over time
- Nauru
- Tonga
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 51.54 0-100 against 50.62 0-100 in Tonga, a difference of 0.92 0-100.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Nauru ahead.
Nauru ranks 101st and Tonga ranks 104th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 2 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.15 0-100 | 43.73 0-100 | 0.4153 0-100 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 49.06 0-100 | 49.23 0-100 | 0.1788 0-100 | Tonga |
| 2020s | 50.7 0-100 | 50.24 0-100 | 0.4646 0-100 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance score, Nauru or Tonga?
- Nauru, at 51.54 0-100 against 50.62 0-100 in Tonga as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance score between Nauru and Tonga?
- 0.92 0-100, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tonga?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Nauru and Tonga rank globally for government effectiveness - governance score?
- Nauru ranks 101st and Tonga ranks 104th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).