Namibia vs Nauru: Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100) (Government score)
Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100) (Government score) over time
- Namibia
- Nauru
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 54.4 0-100 against 53.97 0-100 in Nauru, a difference of 0.43 0-100.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 102nd and Nauru ranks 103rd of 206 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.84 0-100 | 44.85 0-100 | 14.99 0-100 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 57.93 0-100 | 49.66 0-100 | 8.27 0-100 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 55.01 0-100 | 51.33 0-100 | 3.68 0-100 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance score, Namibia or Nauru?
- Namibia, at 54.4 0-100 against 53.97 0-100 in Nauru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance score between Namibia and Nauru?
- 0.43 0-100, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Nauru?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
- How do Namibia and Nauru rank globally for government effectiveness - governance score?
- Namibia ranks 102nd and Nauru ranks 103rd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).