Malaysia vs San Marino: Government Effectiveness - Governance score
Government Effectiveness - Governance score over time
- Malaysia
- San Marino
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 69.13 0-100 against 68.79 0-100 in San Marino, a difference of 0.34 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was San Marino ahead.
Malaysia ranks 40th and San Marino ranks 41st of 204 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 67.1 0-100 | 79.64 0-100 | 12.55 0-100 | San Marino |
| 2020s | 67.36 0-100 | 74.15 0-100 | 6.79 0-100 | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance score, Malaysia or San Marino?
- Malaysia, at 69.13 0-100 against 68.79 0-100 in San Marino as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance score between Malaysia and San Marino?
- 0.34 0-100, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and San Marino?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and San Marino rank globally for government effectiveness - governance score?
- Malaysia ranks 40th and San Marino ranks 41st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).