Libya vs Mali: Government Effectiveness - Governance score
Government Effectiveness - Governance score over time
- Libya
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 26.31 0-100 against 23.74 0-100 in Libya, a difference of 2.57 0-100.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 193rd and Mali ranks 191st of 205 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 27.7 0-100 | 24.96 0-100 | 2.74 0-100 | Libya |
| 2000s | 25 0-100 | 32.87 0-100 | 7.86 0-100 | Mali |
| 2010s | 22.46 0-100 | 33.11 0-100 | 10.65 0-100 | Mali |
| 2020s | 22.09 0-100 | 27.92 0-100 | 5.83 0-100 | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance score, Libya or Mali?
- Mali, at 26.31 0-100 against 23.74 0-100 in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance score between Libya and Mali?
- 2.57 0-100, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Mali?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Mali rank globally for government effectiveness - governance score?
- Libya ranks 193rd and Mali ranks 191st of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).