Kyrgyzstan vs Timor-Leste: Government Effectiveness - Governance score
Government Effectiveness - Governance score over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 34.06 0-100 against 33.87 0-100 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.19 0-100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 171st and Timor-Leste ranks 172nd of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.43 0-100 | 33.13 0-100 | 3.3 0-100 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 35.84 0-100 | 30.28 0-100 | 5.56 0-100 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 34.54 0-100 | 35.92 0-100 | 1.38 0-100 | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance score, Kyrgyzstan or Timor-Leste?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 34.06 0-100 against 33.87 0-100 in Timor-Leste as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance score between Kyrgyzstan and Timor-Leste?
- 0.19 0-100, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Timor-Leste?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Timor-Leste rank globally for government effectiveness - governance score?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 171st and Timor-Leste ranks 172nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).