North Korea vs Libya: Government Effectiveness - Governance score
Government Effectiveness - Governance score over time
- North Korea
- Libya
How they compare
North Korea currently reports 26.62 0-100 against 23.74 0-100 in Libya, a difference of 2.88 0-100.
That makes North Korea's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Libya ahead.
North Korea ranks 189th and Libya ranks 192nd of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, North Korea averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Korea | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.02 0-100 | 27.7 0-100 | 18.68 0-100 | Libya |
| 2000s | 11.18 0-100 | 25 0-100 | 13.83 0-100 | Libya |
| 2010s | 22.02 0-100 | 22.46 0-100 | 0.4459 0-100 | Libya |
| 2020s | 25.62 0-100 | 22.09 0-100 | 3.53 0-100 | North Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance score, North Korea or Libya?
- North Korea, at 26.62 0-100 against 23.74 0-100 in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance score between North Korea and Libya?
- 2.88 0-100, with North Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Korea and Libya?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do North Korea and Libya rank globally for government effectiveness - governance score?
- North Korea ranks 189th and Libya ranks 192nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).