Kenya vs Kosovo: Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100) (Government score)
Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100) (Government score) over time
- Kenya
- Kosovo
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 50.51 0-100 against 50.15 0-100 in Kosovo, a difference of 0.36 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kenya ranks 114th and Kosovo ranks 117th of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Kosovo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.67 0-100 | 43.35 0-100 | 2.68 0-100 | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 46.59 0-100 | 42.87 0-100 | 3.72 0-100 | Kenya |
| 2020s | 47.81 0-100 | 48.99 0-100 | 1.18 0-100 | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance score, Kenya or Kosovo?
- Kenya, at 50.51 0-100 against 50.15 0-100 in Kosovo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance score between Kenya and Kosovo?
- 0.36 0-100, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Kosovo?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Kenya and Kosovo rank globally for government effectiveness - governance score?
- Kenya ranks 114th and Kosovo ranks 117th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).