Hong Kong vs Iceland: Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100) (Government score)

Hong Kong
83.84 0-100
in 2025
Iceland
83.98 0-100
in 2025
Hong Kong rank
18th
Iceland rank
16th

Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100) (Government score) over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Iceland
020406080100199620102025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 83.98 0-100 against 83.84 0-100 in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.14 0-100.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 18th and Iceland ranks 16th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 82.54 0-100 81.82 0-100 0.7167 0-100 Hong Kong
2000s 83.23 0-100 89.35 0-100 6.11 0-100 Iceland
2010s 85.3 0-100 85.01 0-100 0.2929 0-100 Hong Kong
2020s 80.53 0-100 85.49 0-100 4.96 0-100 Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance score, Hong Kong or Iceland?
Iceland, at 83.98 0-100 against 83.84 0-100 in Hong Kong as of 2025.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance score between Hong Kong and Iceland?
0.14 0-100, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Iceland?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong and Iceland rank globally for government effectiveness - governance score?
Hong Kong ranks 18th and Iceland ranks 16th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Iceland: Government Effectiveness - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-score-0-100/hong-kong-sar-china/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-score-0-100/hong-kong-sar-china/iceland/">Hong Kong vs Iceland: Government Effectiveness - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,392 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).