Georgia vs Samoa: Government Effectiveness - Governance score
Government Effectiveness - Governance score over time
- Georgia
- Samoa
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 60.21 0-100 against 59.79 0-100 in Samoa, a difference of 0.42 0-100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Samoa ahead.
Georgia ranks 65th and Samoa ranks 66th of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Samoa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25.86 0-100 | 45.94 0-100 | 20.08 0-100 | Samoa |
| 2000s | 40.13 0-100 | 49.03 0-100 | 8.9 0-100 | Samoa |
| 2010s | 61.38 0-100 | 59.49 0-100 | 1.89 0-100 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 60.07 0-100 | 59.49 0-100 | 0.5882 0-100 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance score, Georgia or Samoa?
- Georgia, at 60.21 0-100 against 59.79 0-100 in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance score between Georgia and Samoa?
- 0.42 0-100, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Samoa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Samoa rank globally for government effectiveness - governance score?
- Georgia ranks 65th and Samoa ranks 66th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).