Eritrea vs Libya: Government Effectiveness - Governance score
Government Effectiveness - Governance score over time
- Eritrea
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 23.74 0-100 against 23.03 0-100 in Eritrea, a difference of 0.71 0-100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Libya ahead.
Eritrea ranks 194th and Libya ranks 193rd of 205 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25.86 0-100 | 27.7 0-100 | 1.84 0-100 | Libya |
| 2000s | 30.32 0-100 | 25 0-100 | 5.32 0-100 | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 25.76 0-100 | 22.46 0-100 | 3.3 0-100 | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 24.23 0-100 | 22.09 0-100 | 2.14 0-100 | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance score, Eritrea or Libya?
- Libya, at 23.74 0-100 against 23.03 0-100 in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance score between Eritrea and Libya?
- 0.71 0-100, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Libya?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Libya rank globally for government effectiveness - governance score?
- Eritrea ranks 194th and Libya ranks 193rd of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).