Chile vs Macao: Government Effectiveness - Governance score
Government Effectiveness - Governance score over time
- Chile
- Macao
How they compare
Macao currently reports 73.04 0-100 against 70.09 0-100 in Chile, a difference of 2.95 0-100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 38th and Macao ranks 35th of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Macao in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 69.79 0-100 | 55.97 0-100 | 13.81 0-100 | Chile |
| 2000s | 74.44 0-100 | 68.84 0-100 | 5.6 0-100 | Chile |
| 2010s | 72.88 0-100 | 72.47 0-100 | 0.4053 0-100 | Chile |
| 2020s | 69.15 0-100 | 73.04 0-100 | 3.89 0-100 | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance score, Chile or Macao?
- Macao, at 73.04 0-100 against 70.09 0-100 in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance score between Chile and Macao?
- 2.95 0-100, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Macao?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Macao rank globally for government effectiveness - governance score?
- Chile ranks 38th and Macao ranks 35th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).