Bulgaria vs Palau: Government Effectiveness - Governance score
Government Effectiveness - Governance score over time
- Bulgaria
- Palau
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 52.17 0-100 against 51.54 0-100 in Palau, a difference of 0.63 0-100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 99th and Palau ranks 101st of 204 countries.
Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.34 0-100 | 42.82 0-100 | 5.52 0-100 | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 48.81 0-100 | 46.44 0-100 | 2.36 0-100 | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 51.35 0-100 | 50.91 0-100 | 0.4396 0-100 | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance score, Bulgaria or Palau?
- Bulgaria, at 52.17 0-100 against 51.54 0-100 in Palau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance score between Bulgaria and Palau?
- 0.63 0-100, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Palau?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Bulgaria and Palau rank globally for government effectiveness - governance score?
- Bulgaria ranks 99th and Palau ranks 101st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).