Bahrain vs Bhutan: Government Effectiveness - Governance score
Government Effectiveness - Governance score over time
- Bahrain
- Bhutan
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 63.01 0-100 against 62.63 0-100 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.38 0-100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bahrain ahead.
Bahrain ranks 61st and Bhutan ranks 62nd of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 3 and Bhutan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 60.49 0-100 | 55.97 0-100 | 4.51 0-100 | Bahrain |
| 2000s | 58.19 0-100 | 56.5 0-100 | 1.7 0-100 | Bahrain |
| 2010s | 59.31 0-100 | 60.66 0-100 | 1.35 0-100 | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 63.79 0-100 | 61.96 0-100 | 1.83 0-100 | Bahrain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance score, Bahrain or Bhutan?
- Bahrain, at 63.01 0-100 against 62.63 0-100 in Bhutan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance score between Bahrain and Bhutan?
- 0.38 0-100, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Bhutan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Bahrain and Bhutan rank globally for government effectiveness - governance score?
- Bahrain ranks 61st and Bhutan ranks 62nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).