Aruba vs Malta: Government Effectiveness - Governance score
Government Effectiveness - Governance score over time
- Aruba
- Malta
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 64.11 0-100 against 63.44 0-100 in Malta, a difference of 0.67 0-100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 56th and Malta ranks 58th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.99 0-100 | 69.45 0-100 | 5.54 0-100 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 68.07 0-100 | 71.64 0-100 | 3.57 0-100 | Malta |
| 2020s | 67.42 0-100 | 68.44 0-100 | 1.02 0-100 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance score, Aruba or Malta?
- Aruba, at 64.11 0-100 against 63.44 0-100 in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance score between Aruba and Malta?
- 0.67 0-100, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Malta?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Malta rank globally for government effectiveness - governance score?
- Aruba ranks 56th and Malta ranks 58th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).