Hong Kong vs Monaco: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to)
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to) over time
- Hong Kong
- Monaco
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.64 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Monaco's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 16th and Monaco ranks 13th of 205 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Monaco in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.9 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.101 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 1.61 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.76 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1553 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to), Hong Kong or Monaco?
- Monaco, at 1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.64 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hong Kong as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to) between Hong Kong and Monaco?
- 0.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Monaco?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Hong Kong and Monaco rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to)?
- Hong Kong ranks 16th and Monaco ranks 13th of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) with 540 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.