Sri Lanka vs Suriname: Good cholesterol levels age standardized
Sri Lanka
1.1
in 2018
Suriname
1.1
in 2018
Sri Lanka rank
102nd
Suriname rank
102nd
Good cholesterol levels age standardized over time
- Sri Lanka
- Suriname
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 1.1 against 1.1 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 102nd and Suriname ranks 102nd of 191 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1.1 | 1.19 | 0.09 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 1.1 | 1.16 | 0.0556 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher good cholesterol levels age standardized, Sri Lanka or Suriname?
- Sri Lanka, at 1.1 against 1.1 in Suriname as of 2018.
- What is the difference in good cholesterol levels age standardized between Sri Lanka and Suriname?
- 0, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Suriname?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Sri Lanka and Suriname rank globally for good cholesterol levels age standardized?
- Sri Lanka ranks 102nd and Suriname ranks 102nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Good cholesterol levels age standardized. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.