Costa Rica vs Nauru: Good cholesterol levels age standardized
Costa Rica
1
in 2018
Nauru
1
in 2018
Costa Rica rank
157th
Nauru rank
157th
Good cholesterol levels age standardized over time
- Costa Rica
- Nauru
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 1 against 1 in Nauru, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 157th and Nauru ranks 157th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Nauru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1 | 0.94 | 0.06 | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 1.03 | 1.05 | 0.02 | Nauru |
| 2000s | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1.01 | 1.02 | 0.0111 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher good cholesterol levels age standardized, Costa Rica or Nauru?
- Costa Rica, at 1 against 1 in Nauru as of 2018.
- What is the difference in good cholesterol levels age standardized between Costa Rica and Nauru?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Nauru?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Costa Rica and Nauru rank globally for good cholesterol levels age standardized?
- Costa Rica ranks 157th and Nauru ranks 157th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Good cholesterol levels age standardized. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.