What is the difference in goal 11: sustainable cities and communities between Aruba and New Caledonia?

0 5 year moving average, with Aruba ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and New Caledonia?

20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as GOAL 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities (5 year moving average). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Aruba vs New Caledonia: GOAL 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities

Aruba

0.75 5 year moving average

in 2023

New Caledonia

0.75 5 year moving average

in 2023

Aruba rank

118th

New Caledonia rank

118th

GOAL 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities over time

Aruba
New Caledonia

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0.75 5 year moving average against 0.75 5 year moving average in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 5 year moving average.

Across all 20 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 118th and New Caledonia ranks 118th of 215 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Aruba	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 5 year moving average	0.0417 5 year moving average	0.0417 5 year moving average	New Caledonia
2010s	0 5 year moving average	0.145 5 year moving average	0.145 5 year moving average	New Caledonia
2020s	0.3045 5 year moving average	0.3857 5 year moving average	0.0812 5 year moving average	New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher goal 11: sustainable cities and communities, Aruba or New Caledonia?: Aruba, at 0.75 5 year moving average against 0.75 5 year moving average in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in goal 11: sustainable cities and communities between Aruba and New Caledonia?: 0 5 year moving average, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and New Caledonia?: 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do Aruba and New Caledonia rank globally for goal 11: sustainable cities and communities?: Aruba ranks 118th and New Caledonia ranks 118th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as GOAL 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities (5 year moving average). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs New Caledonia: GOAL 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/goal-11-sustainable-cities-and-communities-5-year-moving-average/aruba/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/goal-11-sustainable-cities-and-communities-5-year-moving-average/aruba/new-caledonia/">Aruba vs New Caledonia: GOAL 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: GOAL 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities (5 year moving average)
Unit: 5 year moving average
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 215 places, 4,300 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

SDG Goal 11 data availability. Source: UN Global SDG Indicators Database