Namibia vs Uzbekistan: How much global land is used as pasture for livestock?

Namibia
26.28 million
in 2010
Uzbekistan
20.79 million
in 2010
Namibia rank
27th
Uzbekistan rank
30th

How much global land is used as pasture for livestock? over time

  • Namibia
  • Uzbekistan
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M178018952010

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 26.28 million against 20.79 million in Uzbekistan, a difference of 5.49 million.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Uzbekistan's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 27th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 179 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 24 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1780s 5.41 million 3.84 million 1.57 million Namibia
1790s 5.96 million 4.14 million 1.82 million Namibia
1800s 6.56 million 4.46 million 2.10 million Namibia
1810s 7.23 million 4.80 million 2.43 million Namibia
1820s 7.97 million 5.17 million 2.80 million Namibia
1830s 8.78 million 5.57 million 3.22 million Namibia
1840s 9.68 million 5.99 million 3.69 million Namibia
1850s 10.68 million 6.45 million 4.23 million Namibia
1860s 11.78 million 6.94 million 4.84 million Namibia
1870s 13.00 million 7.47 million 5.53 million Namibia
1880s 14.35 million 8.04 million 6.30 million Namibia
1890s 15.83 million 8.67 million 7.16 million Namibia
1900s 17.48 million 9.34 million 8.14 million Namibia
1910s 19.30 million 10.71 million 8.59 million Namibia
1920s 21.32 million 12.18 million 9.13 million Namibia
1930s 23.54 million 13.50 million 10.05 million Namibia
1940s 25.98 million 14.97 million 11.02 million Namibia
1950s 28.70 million 16.57 million 12.13 million Namibia
1960s 36.75 million 18.53 million 18.21 million Namibia
1970s 35.74 million 19.20 million 16.54 million Namibia
1980s 34.63 million 19.53 million 15.10 million Namibia
1990s 33.55 million 19.57 million 13.98 million Namibia
2000s 27.92 million 20.88 million 7.04 million Namibia
2010s 26.28 million 20.79 million 5.49 million Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher how much global land is used as pasture for livestock?, Namibia or Uzbekistan?
Namibia, at 26.28 million against 20.79 million in Uzbekistan as of 2010.
What is the difference in how much global land is used as pasture for livestock? between Namibia and Uzbekistan?
5.49 million, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Uzbekistan?
24 years are reported by both, from 1780 to 2010.
How do Namibia and Uzbekistan rank globally for how much global land is used as pasture for livestock??
Namibia ranks 27th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Taylor and Rising, and United Nations (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as How much global land is used as pasture for livestock?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Uzbekistan: How much global land is used as pasture for livestock?. Statizoid, drawing on Taylor and Rising, and United Nations (2021) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/global-pasture/namibia/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/global-pasture/namibia/uzbekistan/">Namibia vs Uzbekistan: How much global land is used as pasture for livestock?</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
How much global land is used as pasture for livestock?
Source
Taylor and Rising, and United Nations (2021) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
179 places, 4,296 data points, 1780–2010
Last refreshed

The extent of global pasture used for livestock grazing. It does not include cropland used to grow animal feed.