Australia vs Brazil: How much global land is used as pasture for livestock?

Australia
307.84 million
in 2010
Brazil
172.95 million
in 2010
Australia rank
2nd
Brazil rank
5th

How much global land is used as pasture for livestock? over time

  • Australia
  • Brazil
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M178018952010

How they compare

Australia currently reports 307.84 million against 172.95 million in Brazil, a difference of 134.90 million.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.8 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 1780 it was Brazil ahead.

Australia ranks 2nd and Brazil ranks 5th of 179 countries.

Across the 24 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 17 and Brazil in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Brazil Difference Ahead
1780s 0 722,434 722,434 Brazil
1790s 0 816,670 816,670 Brazil
1800s 0 1.02 million 1.02 million Brazil
1810s 0 1.32 million 1.32 million Brazil
1820s 0 2.22 million 2.22 million Brazil
1830s 320,248 3.57 million 3.25 million Brazil
1840s 2.01 million 5.09 million 3.08 million Brazil
1850s 22.23 million 6.85 million 15.38 million Australia
1860s 32.33 million 9.18 million 23.15 million Australia
1870s 46.62 million 12.25 million 34.37 million Australia
1880s 66.59 million 16.29 million 50.30 million Australia
1890s 95.37 million 21.35 million 74.02 million Australia
1900s 136.09 million 27.71 million 108.38 million Australia
1910s 194.03 million 36.03 million 158.00 million Australia
1920s 276.54 million 47.35 million 229.18 million Australia
1930s 307.04 million 63.20 million 243.84 million Australia
1940s 340.79 million 86.46 million 254.34 million Australia
1950s 378.02 million 105.84 million 272.18 million Australia
1960s 413.38 million 119.61 million 293.77 million Australia
1970s 411.54 million 150.49 million 261.05 million Australia
1980s 404.75 million 163.44 million 241.31 million Australia
1990s 377.76 million 168.94 million 208.81 million Australia
2000s 351.44 million 172.69 million 178.74 million Australia
2010s 307.84 million 172.95 million 134.90 million Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher how much global land is used as pasture for livestock?, Australia or Brazil?
Australia, at 307.84 million against 172.95 million in Brazil as of 2010.
What is the difference in how much global land is used as pasture for livestock? between Australia and Brazil?
134.90 million, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Brazil?
24 years are reported by both, from 1780 to 2010.
How do Australia and Brazil rank globally for how much global land is used as pasture for livestock??
Australia ranks 2nd and Brazil ranks 5th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Taylor and Rising, and United Nations (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as How much global land is used as pasture for livestock?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Brazil: How much global land is used as pasture for livestock?. Statizoid, drawing on Taylor and Rising, and United Nations (2021) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/global-pasture/australia/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/global-pasture/australia/brazil/">Australia vs Brazil: How much global land is used as pasture for livestock?</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
How much global land is used as pasture for livestock?
Source
Taylor and Rising, and United Nations (2021) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
179 places, 4,296 data points, 1780–2010
Last refreshed

The extent of global pasture used for livestock grazing. It does not include cropland used to grow animal feed.