Sri Lanka vs Uruguay: Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled
Sri Lanka
0 events
in 2025
Uruguay
0 events
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
67th
Uruguay rank
67th
Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled over time
- Sri Lanka
- Uruguay
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0 events against 0 events in Uruguay, a difference of 0 events.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Uruguay ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 67th and Uruguay ranks 67th of 200 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 1980s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 1990s | 0 events | 0.5 events | 0.5 events | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.1 events | 0.4 events | 0.3 events | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0 events | 0.3333 events | 0.3333 events | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.5 events | 0.9167 events | 0.4167 events | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled, Sri Lanka or Uruguay?
- Sri Lanka, at 0 events against 0 events in Uruguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled between Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 0 events, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2025.
- How do Sri Lanka and Uruguay rank globally for global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled?
- Sri Lanka ranks 67th and Uruguay ranks 67th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Global number of reported disasters by size with 2,158 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.