Morocco vs Zambia: Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled
Morocco
0 events
in 2025
Zambia
0 events
in 2025
Morocco rank
67th
Zambia rank
67th
Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled over time
- Morocco
- Zambia
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 0 events against 0 events in Zambia, a difference of 0 events.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Zambia ahead.
Morocco ranks 67th and Zambia ranks 67th of 200 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 1980s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 1990s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 2000s | 0.45 events | 0.15 events | 0.3 events | Morocco |
| 2010s | 0 events | 0.5833 events | 0.5833 events | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0.3333 events | 0.1667 events | 0.1667 events | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled, Morocco or Zambia?
- Morocco, at 0 events against 0 events in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled between Morocco and Zambia?
- 0 events, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Zambia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2025.
- How do Morocco and Zambia rank globally for global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled?
- Morocco ranks 67th and Zambia ranks 67th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Global number of reported disasters by size with 2,158 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.