Malawi vs Tanzania: Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled
Malawi
0 events
in 2025
Tanzania
0 events
in 2025
Malawi rank
67th
Tanzania rank
67th
Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled over time
- Malawi
- Tanzania
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0 events against 0 events in Tanzania, a difference of 0 events.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 67th and Tanzania ranks 67th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.75 events | 0 events | 0.75 events | Malawi |
| 1970s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 1980s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 1990s | 0.5 events | 0.2 events | 0.3 events | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0.15 events | 0.85 events | 0.7 events | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 0.35 events | 0.05 events | 0.3 events | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled, Malawi or Tanzania?
- Malawi, at 0 events against 0 events in Tanzania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled between Malawi and Tanzania?
- 0 events, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tanzania?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and Tanzania rank globally for global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled?
- Malawi ranks 67th and Tanzania ranks 67th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Global number of reported disasters by size with 2,158 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.