Laos vs Malawi: Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled
Laos
0 events
in 2025
Malawi
0 events
in 2025
Laos rank
67th
Malawi rank
67th
Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled over time
- Laos
- Malawi
How they compare
Laos currently reports 0 events against 0 events in Malawi, a difference of 0 events.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Malawi ahead.
Laos ranks 67th and Malawi ranks 67th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 events | 0.5 events | 0.5 events | Malawi |
| 1970s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 1980s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 1990s | 0 events | 0.5 events | 0.5 events | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 2010s | 0.2 events | 0.35 events | 0.15 events | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0.3333 events | 0 events | 0.3333 events | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled, Laos or Malawi?
- Laos, at 0 events against 0 events in Malawi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled between Laos and Malawi?
- 0 events, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Malawi?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2025.
- How do Laos and Malawi rank globally for global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled?
- Laos ranks 67th and Malawi ranks 67th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Global number of reported disasters by size with 2,158 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.