Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled
Eswatini
1 events
in 2022
Puerto Rico
1 events
in 2025
Eswatini rank
15th
Puerto Rico rank
15th
Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled over time
- Eswatini
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 1 events against 1 events in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 events.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Eswatini ranks 15th and Puerto Rico ranks 15th of 200 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 1990s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 2000s | 0.3889 events | 0.4722 events | 0.0833 events | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 0 events | 0.9167 events | 0.9167 events | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 0.3333 events | 0 events | 0.3333 events | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled, Eswatini or Puerto Rico?
- Eswatini, at 1 events against 1 events in Puerto Rico as of 2022.
- What is the difference in global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled between Eswatini and Puerto Rico?
- 0 events, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Puerto Rico?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2022.
- How do Eswatini and Puerto Rico rank globally for global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled?
- Eswatini ranks 15th and Puerto Rico ranks 15th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Global number of reported disasters by size with 2,158 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.