Eswatini vs Hong Kong: Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled
Eswatini
1 events
in 2022
Hong Kong
1 events
in 2025
Eswatini rank
15th
Hong Kong rank
15th
Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled over time
- Eswatini
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 1 events against 1 events in Hong Kong, a difference of 0 events.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 15th and Hong Kong ranks 15th of 200 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 events | 2.25 events | 2.25 events | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | 0 events | 0.5 events | 0.5 events | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 0.15 events | 1.4 events | 1.25 events | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 0 events | 1.11 events | 1.11 events | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 0.3333 events | 1.89 events | 1.56 events | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled, Eswatini or Hong Kong?
- Eswatini, at 1 events against 1 events in Hong Kong as of 2022.
- What is the difference in global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled between Eswatini and Hong Kong?
- 0 events, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Hong Kong?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2022.
- How do Eswatini and Hong Kong rank globally for global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled?
- Eswatini ranks 15th and Hong Kong ranks 15th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Global number of reported disasters by size with 2,158 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.