Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled
Costa Rica
0 events
in 2025
Rwanda
0 events
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
67th
Rwanda rank
67th
Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled over time
- Costa Rica
- Rwanda
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 events against 0 events in Rwanda, a difference of 0 events.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 67th and Rwanda ranks 67th of 200 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.5 events | 0 events | 0.5 events | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 0.25 events | 0 events | 0.25 events | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 0.375 events | 0 events | 0.375 events | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 0.45 events | 0 events | 0.45 events | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0.1 events | 0.1 events | 0 events | — |
| 2020s | 0.3 events | 0.2 events | 0.1 events | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled, Costa Rica or Rwanda?
- Costa Rica, at 0 events against 0 events in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled between Costa Rica and Rwanda?
- 0 events, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Rwanda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Rwanda rank globally for global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled?
- Costa Rica ranks 67th and Rwanda ranks 67th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Global number of reported disasters by size with 2,158 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.