Colombia vs Eswatini: Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled
Colombia
1 events
in 2025
Eswatini
1 events
in 2022
Colombia rank
15th
Eswatini rank
15th
Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled over time
- Colombia
- Eswatini
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 1 events against 1 events in Eswatini, a difference of 0 events.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 15th and Eswatini ranks 15th of 200 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.5 events | 0 events | 0.5 events | Colombia |
| 1990s | 1 events | 0 events | 1 events | Colombia |
| 2000s | 0.6667 events | 0.3889 events | 0.2778 events | Colombia |
| 2010s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 2020s | 1.67 events | 0.3333 events | 1.33 events | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled, Colombia or Eswatini?
- Colombia, at 1 events against 1 events in Eswatini as of 2025.
- What is the difference in global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled between Colombia and Eswatini?
- 0 events, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Eswatini?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2022.
- How do Colombia and Eswatini rank globally for global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled?
- Colombia ranks 15th and Eswatini ranks 15th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Global number of reported disasters by size with 2,158 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.