Chad vs Malawi: Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled
Chad
0 events
in 2025
Malawi
0 events
in 2025
Chad rank
67th
Malawi rank
67th
Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled over time
- Chad
- Malawi
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0 events against 0 events in Malawi, a difference of 0 events.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Malawi ahead.
Chad ranks 67th and Malawi ranks 67th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 events | 0.5 events | 0.5 events | Malawi |
| 1970s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 1980s | 0.0972 events | 0 events | 0.0972 events | Chad |
| 1990s | 0.1 events | 0.5 events | 0.4 events | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 2010s | 0.25 events | 0.3333 events | 0.0833 events | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled, Chad or Malawi?
- Chad, at 0 events against 0 events in Malawi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled between Chad and Malawi?
- 0 events, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Malawi?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2025.
- How do Chad and Malawi rank globally for global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled?
- Chad ranks 67th and Malawi ranks 67th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Global number of reported disasters by size with 2,158 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.