Cape Verde vs Sri Lanka: Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled
Cape Verde
0 events
in 2025
Sri Lanka
0 events
in 2025
Cape Verde rank
67th
Sri Lanka rank
67th
Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled over time
- Cape Verde
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 0 events against 0 events in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 events.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 67th and Sri Lanka ranks 67th of 200 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 events | 0.3333 events | 0.3333 events | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 2000s | 0.25 events | 0.25 events | 0 events | — |
| 2010s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 2020s | 0 events | 0.5 events | 0.5 events | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled, Cape Verde or Sri Lanka?
- Cape Verde, at 0 events against 0 events in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled between Cape Verde and Sri Lanka?
- 0 events, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Sri Lanka?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and Sri Lanka rank globally for global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled?
- Cape Verde ranks 67th and Sri Lanka ranks 67th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Global number of reported disasters by size with 2,158 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.