Barbados vs Namibia: Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled
Barbados
0 events
in 2024
Namibia
0 events
in 2025
Barbados rank
67th
Namibia rank
67th
Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled over time
- Barbados
- Namibia
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0 events against 0 events in Namibia, a difference of 0 events.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 67th and Namibia ranks 67th of 200 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.5 events | 0 events | 0.5 events | Barbados |
| 1990s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 2000s | 0.6875 events | 0.1875 events | 0.5 events | Barbados |
| 2010s | 0.5625 events | 0.125 events | 0.4375 events | Barbados |
| 2020s | 0.35 events | 0.5 events | 0.15 events | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled, Barbados or Namibia?
- Barbados, at 0 events against 0 events in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled between Barbados and Namibia?
- 0 events, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Namibia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Namibia rank globally for global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled?
- Barbados ranks 67th and Namibia ranks 67th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Global number of reported disasters by size with 2,158 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.