Bangladesh vs Eswatini: Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled
Bangladesh
1 events
in 2025
Eswatini
1 events
in 2022
Bangladesh rank
15th
Eswatini rank
15th
Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled over time
- Bangladesh
- Eswatini
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 1 events against 1 events in Eswatini, a difference of 0 events.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Eswatini ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 15th and Eswatini ranks 15th of 200 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 1990s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 2000s | 0.4444 events | 0.3889 events | 0.0556 events | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 0.5 events | 0 events | 0.5 events | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 0 events | 0.3333 events | 0.3333 events | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled, Bangladesh or Eswatini?
- Bangladesh, at 1 events against 1 events in Eswatini as of 2025.
- What is the difference in global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled between Bangladesh and Eswatini?
- 0 events, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Eswatini?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2022.
- How do Bangladesh and Eswatini rank globally for global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled?
- Bangladesh ranks 15th and Eswatini ranks 15th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Global number of reported disasters by size with 2,158 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.