Bosnia and Herzegovina vs United Arab Emirates: Reported bloodstream infection rate by pathogen

Bosnia and Herzegovina
106.4 infections per million
in 2023
United Arab Emirates
140.9 infections per million
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
28th
United Arab Emirates rank
27th

Reported bloodstream infection rate by pathogen over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • United Arab Emirates
050100150201620192023

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 140.9 infections per million against 106.4 infections per million in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 34.5 infections per million.

That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.3 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 28th and United Arab Emirates ranks 27th of 65 countries.

United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
2010s 72.17 infections per million 89.9 infections per million 17.73 infections per million United Arab Emirates
2020s 77.17 infections per million 134.57 infections per million 57.4 infections per million United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reported bloodstream infection rate by pathogen, Bosnia and Herzegovina or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 140.9 infections per million against 106.4 infections per million in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in reported bloodstream infection rate by pathogen between Bosnia and Herzegovina and United Arab Emirates?
34.5 infections per million, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and United Arab Emirates?
7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and United Arab Emirates rank globally for reported bloodstream infection rate by pathogen?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 28th and United Arab Emirates ranks 27th of 65 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Reported bloodstream infection rate by pathogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs United Arab Emirates: Reported bloodstream infection rate by pathogen. Statizoid, drawing on World Health Organization (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/global-antimicrobial-resistance-and-use-surveillance-system-glass-by-pathogen/bosnia-and-herzegovina/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/global-antimicrobial-resistance-and-use-surveillance-system-glass-by-pathogen/bosnia-and-herzegovina/united-arab-emirates/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs United Arab Emirates: Reported bloodstream infection rate by pathogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reported bloodstream infection rate by pathogen
Unit
infections per million
Source
World Health Organization (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
65 places, 442 data points, 2016–2023
Last refreshed

Bacteriologically confirmed bloodstream infections where the pathogen is Escherichia coli per million people.