Croatia vs Namibia: GHG growth
GHG growth over time
- Croatia
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports -4.1% against -4.5% in Croatia, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 182nd and Namibia ranks 181st of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.3% | 0.5% | 1.8% | Croatia |
| 2000s | 0.3% | 1.7% | 1.4% | Namibia |
| 2010s | -3.7% | -0.2% | 3.6% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ghg growth, Croatia or Namibia?
- Namibia, at -4.1% against -4.5% in Croatia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in ghg growth between Croatia and Namibia?
- 0.4%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Namibia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2018.
- How do Croatia and Namibia rank globally for ghg growth?
- Croatia ranks 182nd and Namibia ranks 181st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Climate Watch. 2020. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Available online at: https://www.climatewatchdata.org, published as GHG growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Greenhouse gas emissions growth is generated from the World Resource Institute's Climate Watch. Climate Watch Historical Emission data contains sector-level greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data for 194 countries and the European Union (EU) for the period 1990-2018, including emissions of the six major GHGs from most major sources and sinks. Non-CO2 emissions are expressed in CO2 equivalents using 100-year global warming potential values from IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Climate Watch Historical GHG Emissions data (previously published through CAIT Climate Data Explorer) are derived from several sources. Any use of the Land-Use Change and Forestry or Agriculture indicator should be cited as FAO 2020, FAOSTAT Emissions Database. Any use of CO2 emissions from fuel combustion data should be cited as CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, OECD/IEA, 2020.