Congo vs Ecuador: GHG growth
GHG growth over time
- Congo
- Ecuador
How they compare
Congo currently reports 2.0% against 1.8% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 70th and Ecuador ranks 73rd of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.0% | 1.4% | 0.4% | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 2.7% | 1.0% | 1.8% | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.1% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ghg growth, Congo or Ecuador?
- Congo, at 2.0% against 1.8% in Ecuador as of 2018.
- What is the difference in ghg growth between Congo and Ecuador?
- 0.2%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Ecuador?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2018.
- How do Congo and Ecuador rank globally for ghg growth?
- Congo ranks 70th and Ecuador ranks 73rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Climate Watch. 2020. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Available online at: https://www.climatewatchdata.org, published as GHG growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Greenhouse gas emissions growth is generated from the World Resource Institute's Climate Watch. Climate Watch Historical Emission data contains sector-level greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data for 194 countries and the European Union (EU) for the period 1990-2018, including emissions of the six major GHGs from most major sources and sinks. Non-CO2 emissions are expressed in CO2 equivalents using 100-year global warming potential values from IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Climate Watch Historical GHG Emissions data (previously published through CAIT Climate Data Explorer) are derived from several sources. Any use of the Land-Use Change and Forestry or Agriculture indicator should be cited as FAO 2020, FAOSTAT Emissions Database. Any use of CO2 emissions from fuel combustion data should be cited as CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, OECD/IEA, 2020.