Bhutan vs Nauru: GHG growth
GHG growth over time
- Bhutan
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 4.3% against 4.2% in Bhutan, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Nauru ahead.
Bhutan ranks 34th and Nauru ranks 33rd of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Nauru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.7% | -3.1% | 2.4% | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 0.0% | -6.8% | 6.9% | Bhutan |
| 2010s | -1.7% | 5.8% | 7.5% | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ghg growth, Bhutan or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 4.3% against 4.2% in Bhutan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in ghg growth between Bhutan and Nauru?
- 0.1%, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Nauru?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2018.
- How do Bhutan and Nauru rank globally for ghg growth?
- Bhutan ranks 34th and Nauru ranks 33rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Climate Watch. 2020. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Available online at: https://www.climatewatchdata.org, published as GHG growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Greenhouse gas emissions growth is generated from the World Resource Institute's Climate Watch. Climate Watch Historical Emission data contains sector-level greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data for 194 countries and the European Union (EU) for the period 1990-2018, including emissions of the six major GHGs from most major sources and sinks. Non-CO2 emissions are expressed in CO2 equivalents using 100-year global warming potential values from IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Climate Watch Historical GHG Emissions data (previously published through CAIT Climate Data Explorer) are derived from several sources. Any use of the Land-Use Change and Forestry or Agriculture indicator should be cited as FAO 2020, FAOSTAT Emissions Database. Any use of CO2 emissions from fuel combustion data should be cited as CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, OECD/IEA, 2020.