Cape Verde vs Hong Kong, China: GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - N2O

Cape Verde
52.33
in 2015
Hong Kong, China
73.04
in 2015
Cape Verde rank
163rd
Hong Kong, China rank
161st

GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - N2O over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Hong Kong, China
406080100120199020022015

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 73.04 against 52.33 in Cape Verde, a difference of 20.71.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.4 times Cape Verde's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 163rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 161st of 201 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1990s 50.89 88.08 37.19 Hong Kong, China
2000s 62.15 77.84 15.69 Hong Kong, China
2010s 53.43 72.89 19.47 Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ghg emissions from food systems, by gas (mt co2 eq) - n2o, Cape Verde or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 73.04 against 52.33 in Cape Verde as of 2015.
What is the difference in ghg emissions from food systems, by gas (mt co2 eq) - n2o between Cape Verde and Hong Kong, China?
20.71, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Hong Kong, China?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Cape Verde and Hong Kong, China rank globally for ghg emissions from food systems, by gas (mt co2 eq) - n2o?
Cape Verde ranks 163rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 161st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - N2O. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Hong Kong, China: GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/ghg-emissions-from-food-systems-by-gas-mt-co2-eq-n2o/cabo-verde/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/ghg-emissions-from-food-systems-by-gas-mt-co2-eq-n2o/cabo-verde/hong-kong-sar-china/">Cape Verde vs Hong Kong, China: GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - N2O
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
201 places, 5,226 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

GHG emissions from food systems disaggregated by gas are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).